Why not use JSON as the base web design technology instead of HTML?

Keith685

JSON is a great alternative to XML for a number of reasons. JSON is lighter weight, faster, and easier to parse. JSON is also language independent, making it a good choice for data interchange.

Darrell338

I don't think replacing HTML with JSON is a good idea for a few reasons. First, JSON is not as widely used as HTML and there are not as many tools and resources available for working with it. Second, JSON is not as well suited to the creation of complex, highly-structured documents as HTML is. Third, JSON files are generally larger and take longer to download than HTML files. Finally, JSON is not as well supported by web browsers as HTML is.

Gene801

There are a few reasons why JSON might not be a good choice as a base web design technology:

JSON is designed for data exchange, not for displaying data in a human-readable format. While you can use JSON to store and retrieve data, it is not as easy to read or write as HTML.
JSON does not have the same level of support in web browsers as HTML. While most browsers can parse and work with JSON data, they do not provide the same level of support for JSON as they do for HTML.
JSON is not as widely used as HTML. While JSON is gaining in popularity, it is still not as widely used as HTML. This means that there are fewer tools and resources available for working with JSON.
JSON is not as well suited for use with CSS and JavaScript as HTML is. While it is possible to use JSON with CSS and JavaScript, it is not as easy or as straightforward as using HTML.

Overall, JSON has some advantages over HTML as a data exchange format, but it is not as well suited for use as a base web design technology.